If dreams, fantasy, and the
subconscious serve as the inspiration for Surrealism, then what significance is
to be found in things which aren't real? Wouldn't we better spend our time looking at
images corresponding to realities, such as the great historical paintings, like
Jacques-Louis David's Oath of the Tennis Court?
The truth is that Surrealist artists saw a truth to be found within the
subconscious—not just from a Freudian perspective but for the sake of art as
well. Like Manet, these artists sought
to paint what they saw as the truth (albeit a different kind of truth, or with
different approaches). The
deconstructive agenda of the prior generation—of the Dadaists and the Abstract
and Non-Objective painters—was expanded with the Surrealists into a broader
agenda not only commenting on art but reality itself. Many of these paintings make overt and direct
commentary on the nature of life and the human condition. This can come about through the Surreal since
our subconscious already works within a level of cognizance outside of the
parameters of reality. In other words,
these confusing paintings address our minds in more direct ways than any other
art we have looked at so far, because they directly call upon and engage that
latent aspect of our psyche which communicates best through art: the
subconscious.
René Magritte became famous for
challenging the human eye to look at otherwise ordinary objects and scenes in
different lights and different contexts.
His playful distortion of reality and perception commented on the
expanding potential for creativity within the arts but also carried intriguing
implications for philosophy and sociology in the real world. The artist himself viewed his work as a means
of exploring the truth about the human experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment