Another point about Georgia
O'Keeffe's artwork which receives a lot of attention particularly today is her
latent sexual imagery. Many within her
series of flower paintings contain double-readings of the plant as a symbol for
nature and Mother Nature. In
characterizing this aspect of her subject matter, then, the artist has often
painted vague likenesses to the female anatomy.
The maternal breast of Mother Nature may be implied here, whereas other
works by the artist show flowers that look like a vagina. This controversial reading causes us to
question what we're seeing when O'Keeffe enlarges an ordinarily small plant to
the size of an entire canvas—some filling enormous canvases up to nearly six
feet wide. Is this a statement on
sexuality? After all, flowers are often
held to be symbols of femininity. This
could be the personal expression of the artist herself, finding an element of
her own human nature in an object from nature; or it could fall back on the
role of viewer perception in appreciating artwork. Like I said, these works are not
Surrealistic, but one sees the possibility to perceive, even within commonplace
items like flowers, images within images through art and the ability of the
painter to stylistically portray subject matter in any way he or she wants.
No comments:
Post a Comment