One more infamous work by the
artist Édouard Manet which was also featured in the 1863 Salon des refusés is his painting titled Olympia.
This is a painting of a prostitute,
and although we have read about and seen images of nude women posing for male
artists, this is the first outspokenly explicit painting to make such blatant
references to prostitution. In a way,
this is very similar to Titian's Venus of Urbino except that no masking
cover-up (such as Titian's reference to Ancient Roman mythology) exists here to
whitewash or disguise the fact that we're looking at a prostitute. She is naked, lying on a bed of white sheets
and an elaborately stitched blanket, in a room of a whore house. Her jewelry and the flower in her hair
furthermore demonstrate the particular line of work she is in, just so that
there is no doubt, and her present lack of clothing goes to show that she is in
fact currently on call. Once again, we
are meant to feel sympathy for this young woman, as hers is most certainly not
a desirable state for the ordinary Victorian woman to find herself in. Her skin is pale, milky white, and her nude
exposure gives her an air of vulnerability.
The black necklace she wears contrasts with the smooth pallor of her
skin and almost further objectifies her as somebody captive to her system of
life, someone who must be forced to tote herself around in jewelry for the sake
of her trade, like a dog wearing a leash.
She's laid out for everyone to look at her—how exploitative and
unfair! And yet, she is, upon closer
inspection, not so fragile and not so helpless.
Actually, Manet ingeniously turns the viewer into the victim of this
scandal and in turn empowers the woman, as we are about to see.
A maid has entered this private
chamber in the artwork to give the girl a bouquet of flowers (probably a gift
or a payment from her last customer); she's indifferent to them. She is looking somewhere else: at us. Here Manet has broken the fourth wall yet
again; the curtain at the upper left hand corner of the frame has been drawn
back; and we are once more looking at an intentional display created by the
artist, like with The Bar at the Folies-Bergère (which was actually painted
many years after this one). The
implication is that we, the viewer, are her next client. For the upper-class art critics and
connoisseurs of Victorian society, this was not just scandalous; this was
embarrassing.
For the painting, Manet purposely
picked a well-known female model, whom all the other artists would be sure to
recognize, in order to put his male viewers on the spot when attending the
salon with their friends and family.
They would know this woman, and the stereotype of secret sexuality
within the artist-model relationship would immediately conjure up reactions of
awkwardness and discomfort. They had all
seen her and may or may not have had romantic affairs with her while employing
her services as a model. When Manet
paints her as a prostitute, naked and stripped of all of her individualism to
the point of becoming a commodity, he is commenting on the other artists'
objectifying act of using this model for their own art. Here is a vindictively provocative display of
her as she was allegedly being treated by her patron artists: as a whore. The way in which art used people as subjects
was something Manet wanted to alter and, if he could, totally reverse. Here, as I said, the viewer is indicated to
be the woman's next client. By putting the painting's viewers in such an
awkward place, it was almost like the woman was exploiting them now as much as
they had done to her. And look at her
cold, indifferent eyes staring back at us.
The roles have switched; art is now bored at looking at us. She gazes out at her viewers as nothing but
another customer in her day; and as much as artists and viewers alike
wrongfully (according to Manet) exploit her and take advantage of her through
images and objectification on the visual level and sex on the physical level,
she is as able to peer back at us with a power of her own through a defiantly
indifferent, unresponsive stare at the visual level and a brutal indictment on
the subliminal level.
Also—I don't know if you can see it
in this poorly pixilated jpeg image—there's a black cat on the far right of the
painting who's looking out at us, too. The
cat as a feminine feline can perhaps be associated with the scene, since this
is a painting of a woman; but its presence bears further significance than a
mere environmental arrangement or addition to the room, like a piece of the
furniture. It begs to be noticed, what
with its eyes glaring straight out at us and its tail standing on end. The cat at the foot of the bed replaces the
loyal dog, which was a symbol of faithfulness and fidelity (or Fido, in Latin). The replacement is noted; and I'm not going
to go as far as to say the cat is a symbol for Modernism, but it does lend the
painting an even more unsettling tone and an overall sense that Manet's artwork
is associating itself with a different tradition (I don't say a new one;
because this particular symbolism goes back to some of the earliest history
we've looked at).
Ever since ancient times, black
cats have retained a status of symbolic importance throughout Western
culture. If you recall to mind our
discussion of Ancient Egypt (which feels like a long time ago), you remember
that the Egyptians worshipped black cats as representatives of the maternal
goddess Bast. Devotion to this goddess
led people to routinely mummify and bury cats along with the deceased, placing
them with the sarcophagus in the elaborately constructed tombs of the region
with the belief that the spirit of the cat would help guide and protect the
human soul's journey through the afterlife.
The ancient city of Bubastis in the Lower Kingdom was the capital for
this particular cult and was described by Herodotus in his Histories as well as mentioned by the biblical prophet Ezekiel
nearly 150 years earlier in his Old Testament book of prophecy. In Ezekiel 30:17, "Aven" is the
Ancient Egyptian city of Heliopolis, about 50 km south of Bubastis, and in this
verse the prophet accurately foretold, nearly 250 years before the actual
event, of the destruction of the pagan cult "by the sword" (fulfilled
when Alexander the Great conquered this city as part of his Egyptian campaign
in 332B.C.). But cats continued to find significance in
cultural symbolism all over the world.
In Europe they became a symbol of witchcraft,
superstition, and death and were even hunted down as spiritual enemies. It is stipulated that the extermination of
black cats for these superstitious reasons during the Middle Ages played a
primary role in the enlargement of the rat population all across Western Europe
that led to the spread of bubonic plague at the onset of the Black Death. Black cats represented darkness and mystery
during the Renaissance, and they were often depicted in relation to witches, as
magical helpers in their dark arts. The
famous opening scene of Shakespeare's Macbeth
featured such a black cat, Graymalkin, the "spirit familiar" of the
three witches. And the symbolism
continues on to this day, to our celebratory traditions of Halloween, when
black cats become scary omens and bringers of bad luck.
Whether an allusion to Bast,
Graymalkin, or merely the general ill-favored symbol of the animal throughout
time, the black cat in Manet's painting conveys an aura of mysterious
significance that perhaps means to intentionally elude our understanding. That, I believe, is the point of its presence
in this otherwise single-minded work. It
perhaps has nothing to do with the woman (since I don't think Manet is trying
to show that she is a witch or sorceress), but it lends a strange fantasy
quality to the work similar to the nude woman in the artist's painting Le Déjeuner
sur l'herbe (exhibited the same year).
As we recall from that painting, we are entering the fantastical,
irrational, and otherworldly realm of the artist's mind when we look at
art. It is a step from familiar
materialism into the whimsical fancy of the artist's mental construction of a
subject, and therefore it opens up the door to an altogether unlimited
dimension. The otherwise random presence
of a black cat in this already-wild painting further goes to show that the
world of the canvas is wholly not
something with which we are familiar, though we may think we are. This is a world of weird fiction and
subconscious illimitability.
Prostitution, brazen female nudity, scandal, and dark references to
witchcraft and superstition—this painting simply unleashes art as a potential
medium for the embodiment of the Absurd and the incarnation of unbridled
imagination (in all its glory, terror, and mystery).
No comments:
Post a Comment