In 1789 France was bankrupt. The nation had been left in debt after the
Seven Years' War and the American Revolutionary War. The king's initial, answering decree to this
dilemma was simply to increase taxes, but, clearly no economist himself, Louis
XVI proved ineffective at establishing new taxation laws. The taxes did not just rise higher, they shot
dramatically upward. Suddenly, the
carefree aristocrats could no longer support their lavish lifestyles, while
most peasants could not even afford food.
The rising complaint became the king's lack of concern for domestic
matters. Funding and military support
had been so amply donated to the American Colonies over the past several years
that France was itself at risk of collapsing into insurmountable debt. The higher taxation that the king implemented
to solve the problem only further infuriated the bourgeoisie, who quickly moved to skepticism over the effectiveness
of their king, Louis XVI, in office. The
country was also suffering from an ongoing famine that led to a severe economic
inflation. Bread prices especially
skyrocketed, and the first riots to break out in France among the lower-class
masses dealt with this very issue.
But increasingly the nation's poor
economic situation became a political issue.
Fed up on higher taxes, the French aristocracy began questioning the
right of the king to absolute authority.
This had been an Enlightenment ideal (among its supporters had been
Thomas Hobbes). So, naturally an attack
on their king's right to sovereignty meant not only a political struggle but an
intellectual struggle as well, an ideological struggle, and even a philosophical
one. Unfortunately, circumstances were
too intolerably bad to allow much time for heavy consideration over the
subject—the subject which, though unspoken and indefinite, nevertheless
pervaded the air: revolution—so the bureaucrats and members of the Third Estate
near Versailles convened to debate and discuss the matter publically in
conference. (France did not, strictly
speaking, have a parliament at this time, but neither was this a simple town
meeting. The Third Estate, briefly
defined, was a societal order of lower-class people, represented by members who
volunteered to appear in the Estates General, a series of ongoing political
forum sessions similar to, but certainly not corresponding with, parliamentary
assemblies.) The debate was to be
concerned with the nation's adoption of a constitution to replace the
monarchical system of government hitherto practiced (and doubtless the idea for
a constitutional government took inspiration from the American
Revolution). A constitution would limit
the king's power and ensure a more stable government; but to what kind of
problems would it lead? And who would
write the constitution for them? These
were all questions to be discussed in the assembly.
In late June, members of the Third
Estate met in the city of Versailles to hold an Estates General assembly but
were shocked to find the assembly house barred shut. The king, fearing the growth of treacherous
sentiment among the public, had the building locked and guarded, forbidding the
citizens' entry into their own house of meeting. Determined to enact this council, the five
hundred plus attendees walked across the street to a nearby tennis court and
met inside it. The historic moment was
commemorated in an unfinished drawing, which has since become famous, by artist
Jacques-Louis David. It was here, inside
a tennis court, that members of the Third Estate decided to band together in
full-out protest of the king and not stop until a constitution had been
written. Their statement of resolve
toward this matter was called the Tennis Court Oath.
Perhaps the fact that the king had
tried to stop ordinary citizens from meeting in public had something to do with
their ultimate decision, but it has been argued that the king had not done so
on purpose; that, because of the recent death of his son (sixteen days earlier)
all political meeting houses were closed out of sheer formality, because the
king was still in mourning. Generally,
however, it is agreed that the king overstepped his boundaries by banning
citizens from public meeting houses—at least, that was the ruling of the French
lower class in 1789.
No comments:
Post a Comment